MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788677216 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2017-0587

Numerical and experimental simulation of dowel action across reinforced concrete (RC) cracks under two-directional loading

2018· article· en· W2788677216 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowelStructural engineeringPrecast concreteSubgradeAction (physics)Shear (geology)Mechanism (biology)Path (computing)Reinforced concreteBeam (structure)Geotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The local and global behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) members and structures may be affected by cracks and the capabilities of stress transfer mechanisms. Dowel action is one of the shear transfer mechanisms across RC cracks and particularly is the only mechanism in pre-formed joints that are common in precast concrete connections. Herein, the path-dependent behavior of dowel action mechanism is examined experimentally and analytically. Firstly, the effect of loading history and direction on the shear transfer capabilities of crossing bars are investigated experimentally. Then, according to the experimental results and observations, a model is extended to simulate and capture the directional path-dependent behavior of dowel action by introducing consistent formulas for subgrade springs based on the beam on the elastic foundation analogy. Verification is carried out by comparing with the corresponding experimental results and shows the fair accuracy of the proposed model and assumptions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it