MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788731613 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.26344.32002

The Role of the Socio-Physical Environment on Aging in Place for Older Adults in Cohousing and Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities

2017· dissertation· en· W2788731613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAging in placeGerontologyBuilt environmentSociologyPsychologyEngineeringCivil engineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The majority of Canada’s older adults want to “age in place” in their home and community as long as possible, even in the face of declining health and physical functioning. Cohousing and Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities (NORC) have been identified as potential aging in place phenomenon. However, empirical research on both communities in Canada is either scarce or nonexistent. A multiple-case study design was used to gain an understanding of the influence of the physical and social environment of residential settings and neighbourhoods on aging in place processes among older adults in cohousing and NORC. Twenty (20) older adults living in cohousing or NORC in British Columbia, Canada were recruited to conduct photovoices and semi-structured interviews. Data was collected and analyzed following constructivist grounded theory methodology. Findings show that aging in place processes were influenced by interacting factors found at multiple levels. At the individual and psychosocial level, aging in place was influenced by older adults’ health status, functional ability, mobility capacity, agency, resilience, and feeling of safety. At the physical environment level, associations with accessibility, functionality, neighbourhood destinations, and aesthetics were found. At the social environment level, aging in place was linked to community engagement, mutual support, meaningful social connections, and the social fabric of the neighbourhood. In addition, mobility was central to participants’ experience of place. Based on these findings, a conceptual framework on aging in place is proposed to better explain the complex dynamics between older adults and the physical and social environments of the neighbourhood. The integrated analysis of the residential and neighbourhood environments highlighted the relevance of considering “place” in aging as a continuum of various geographical scales in future research. This study documents, for the first time in Canada, the experience of older adults living in NORC and cohousing communities. In which manner these communities may provide an optimal environment for aging in place needs to be further documented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it