MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788769962 · doi:10.19079/metodo.2.2.89

Die Inszenierung des Virtuellen. Kelly Richardson: Mariner 9 [The Enactment of the Virtual. Kelly Richardson: Mariner 9]

2014· article· de· W2788769962 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hans Rainer Sepp

Bibliographic record

VenueMetodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries and Information Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReciprocalVirtual realityAffectionSpace (punctuation)AestheticsComputer scienceArtEpistemologyPhilosophyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This phenomenological analysis of the video installation Mariner 9 made by the Canadian artist Kelly Richardson in 2012 will gain a basic concept of the virtual. It will be realized by three preparing steps and a final conclusion. First, it will be shown in which way the experiencing of Richardson’s installation causes a break within the space-time-continuum of our worldly living. The second step develops how the interrupting, non-mediating force of this break of our horizontal experience keeps in a permanent relationship to the counterpart force of a mediating pretension of reality so that a reciprocal relation of breaking off and continual imagining prevails. The third step explains the function of the living human body as an orienting one, and the last step fixes the concept of the virtual. The virtual grows up here in the way that the alternation of reality pretension – supported by the imaginative conception of the installation as a whole – as well as of the bodily affection of threatening – resulting from the interruption of the space- time-continuum – provokes a specific experiencing of reality; this experience does not correlate with a real objectiveness but it is real in itself and has real moments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.022
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and PhilosophySame topicLibraries and Information ServicesFrench-language works237,207