MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788791555 · doi:10.1242/jeb.169888

Invasive crab eats through its gills

2018· article· en· W2788791555 on OpenAlexaffabout
Oana Birceanu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGillCarcinus maenasEstuaryCrustaceanBiologyEcologyInvertebrateHorseshoe crabZoologyFisheryDecapodaFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The green shore crab, Carcinus maenas, known by many as an invasive species that can be found just about anywhere in the world, lives in the ever-changing environment of the estuaries. This common arthropod is able to tolerate changes in water salinity, fluctuations in water temperature and high concentrations of aquatic contaminants on a daily basis. However, researchers have now discovered that it can also do something else that is quite remarkable and was previously thought to be impossible: it can eat through its gills.Tamzin Blewett, a post-doctoral fellow at University of Alberta, Canada, and her colleague Greg Goss found it strange that the largest group of estuarine inhabitants, the arthropods – which include crabs and other crustaceans – did not seem to tap into the protein-rich environment of the estuaries, while other species, such as soft-bodied invertebrates, some vertebrates and mussels, had been previously shown to take advantage of this protein-rich environment by absorbing nutrients through either their skin or their gills. This mechanism would seem to be impossible in the hard-bodied arthropods, whose gills hide behind a hard exoskeleton.Undeterred by previous research that suggested that the crab gills are simply not suited for more than gas exchange and ion regulation, the two researchers developed a clever technique to investigate the ability of the green shore crab to take up the amino acid l-leucine, which is most prevalent in the estuaries and can be used as a source of protein in the body. The authors extracted sections of the front and rear of the gill, which are involved in gas exchange and ion regulation, respectively, from the crab. Then, they measured the rate of uptake of l-leucine by placing the gills in a carefully controlled solution consisting of artificial seawater and varying concentrations of l-leucine. Compiling their measurements, Blewett and Goss determined that l-leucine is indeed taken up via a specific transport mechanism at the gills.When comparing l-leucine uptake rates between the front and rear portions of the gill, the duo found that the rear section of the gill, which is responsible for maintaining constant ion levels in the body, takes up more l-leucine than the front section and concluded that amino acid uptake may be linked to mechanisms that monitor and control ion levels in crabs. Perhaps these amino acids also play a role in maintaining a constant osmotic pressure in the arthropod bodies, to prevent unnecessary water uptake or loss in the ever-changing environment of the estuaries, where salinity varies daily. Although this still needs to be investigated, it is clear that this invasive, hardy crab uses all of its evolutionary advantages to thrive in one of the harshest environments on earth. In the words of the US kids show ‘Wild Kratts’, crabs have some ‘amazing creature powers’!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207