MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788864376 · doi:10.1007/s10562-018-2319-2

Kinetic Investigation of η-Al2O3 Catalyst for Dimethyl Ether Production

2018· article· en· W2788864376 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ahmed I. Osman, Jehad K. Abu‐Dahrieh

Bibliographic record

VenueCatalysis Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouth Valley UniversityQueen's UniversityQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsDimethyl etherChemistryCatalysisMethanolDehydrationActivation energyKinetic energyAdsorptionEtherDehydration reactionInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy consumption throughout the world has been continuously increased especially for industrialized cities. The carbon-based non-renewable sources, mainly crude oil, are unsustainable because of the production of the significant amount of greenhouse gases in which is the main cause of the global warming. To meet the energy demand and decrease the air pollution an alternative renewable energy should be developed. The production of clean biofuel such as dimethyl ether (DME) is an attractive alternative for pollution mitigation. DME is an environmentally friendly fuel with clean-burning and smoke-free emissions [ 1 ]. The attractive combustion properties are due to it containing neither sulphur nor nitrogen, with very low SO x or NO x emissions. The lack of direct carbon-to-carbon bonds means it does not generate particulate matter emissions. DME can be produced by two main routes; either from syngas using a bi-functional catalyst (Eq. 1 ) or via the dehydration of methanol over solid catalysts such as Al 2 O 3 (Eq. 2 ), according to the following reactions [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCatalysis LettersSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207