El micvé de la darrera sinagoga medieval de Girona
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1415, Girona’s Jewish community was confined to an enclosure physically\n\t\t\t\t separated from the rest of the city by a wall. It was in that scaled-down Jewish quarter that the aljama (a Spanish term of Arabic origin used in old official documents\n\t\t\t\t to designate self-governing communities of Moors and Jews living under\n\t\t\t\t Spanish rule) established Girona’s third and last synagogue. Archive documents\n\t\t\t\t show that it stood on part of what is now the site of the Bonastruc ça Porta Centre.\n\t\t\t\t In the interests of having a more comprehensive and accurate record of the Jewish\n\t\t\t\t community’s physical spaces and heritage, Girona City Council has organised various\n\t\t\t\t archaeological excavations at the spot in question. The most recent digs, which\n\t\t\t\t took place in 2014 and 2015, unearthed several structures associated with a mikveh\n\t\t\t\t (ritual bath). Drawing on all the surviving documentary evidence, we describe how\n\t\t\t\t those structures must have been and trace their history over the 15th century
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".