MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789068388 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.c444

Manhole Cover Displacement Caused by the Release of Entrapped Air Pockets

2018· article· en· W2789068388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jue Wang, José G. Vasconcelos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover (algebra)Displacement (psychology)Variety (cybernetics)Environmental scienceForensic engineeringGeotechnical engineeringGeologyEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stormwater systems undergoing rapid filling may present a variety of operational problems, one such being the displacement of manhole covers, which can threaten both traffic and pedestrians.There are scarce documentation and few measurements of flow conditions in rapidly filling stormwater systems, and it is speculated that air pressurization within manholes leads to such displacements.There can be different causes of air pressurization in manholes, among which is the release of entrapped air pockets through water-filled shafts.Research has indicated that such releases will result in the displacement of the free surface within these manholes, which in turn may create conditions for air to develop enough pressure to overcome the weight of a manhole cover and displace it.This paper presents results from an ongoing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of air pocket release in shafts with limited ventilation at the cover.Results indicate that releases of large air pockets can create pressure surges that far exceed the threshold for manhole cover displacement, and that pressure rise can occur within a few seconds following air admission into the shaft.The ultimate goal of this investigation is to provide better guidance for the management of air in junctions within stormwater systems, and to prevent operational issues that are linked to air-water flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207