Antagonistic regulation with a unique setpoint, integral and double integral action
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Several biochemical species are in organisms controlled in a pairwise manner i.e., two different species (e.g., hormone, enzyme, transporter protein) work to control the concentration of a third chemical species. Such pairs are often antagonistic, meaning that one of the controller species acts to increase whereas the other controller species acts to decrease the amount of the controlled species. How antagonistic systems interact to achieve regulation and to avoid competing against each other is not fully understood. An issue is how two antagonistic hormones can agree upon one common setpoint. We present here a new type of antagonistic regulatory system that has a single unique setpoint inherently defined by the system. The regulatory system controls the concentration of a chemical species with both integral and double integral action, achieving tight control. We show by the use of an analytical stability analysis, using the principle of vanishing perturbations, that the setpoint is asymptotically stable. Finally the prospect of treating the presented system as a part of a larger family of antagonistic regulatory systems with unique setpoints, integral and double integral action is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".