MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789243518 · doi:10.1080/15470148.2017.1419153

Theory of planned behavior and intention to attend a fan convention

2018· article· en· W2789243518 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Convention & Event Tourism · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia Influence and Health
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheory of planned behaviorPsychologyConventionSocial psychologyFriendshipIngroups and outgroupsAttendanceContext (archaeology)ClubControl (management)SociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the variables predicting fans' intention to attend a fan-related convention. The theory of planned behavior posits that individuals' attitudes, norms, and behavioral control predict individuals' intended behaviors. Bronies—adult fans of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic—rated items regarding theory of planned behavior, past convention attendance, ingroup identification, and intention to attend a brony convention. Results showed that attitudes, norms, perceived control, past behavior, and ingroup identification all uniquely predicted intention to attend. Results and study limitations are discussed within the context of the existing literature, with implications for future research on the topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it