Design of reconfigurable frequency‐selective surfaces including the PIN diode threshold region
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconfigurable frequency‐selective surfaces (RFSSs) are of significant interest in applications, such as secure communication systems or tunable radomes, to improve indoor communication and smart antennas. In order to change the frequency‐selective surface (FSS) characteristics, and therefore its frequency response, conventional methods include loading with active semiconductor devices such as varactors, PIN diodes, Schottky diodes and radio‐frequency microelectromechanical system. Another possibility is the use of mechanical adjusts, such as spring resonators or mechanical rotation. When PIN diodes are used, commonly only the reverse and forward regions, OFF and ON states, respectively, are considered. In this study, the implementation of an RFSS is described, using PIN diodes as active components. The RFSS is based on the four‐arms star geometry, and initial design equations and procedures are presented. Numerical and measured results are shown for different project stages, with a very good agreement. In addition to obtaining two distinct resonant frequencies, due to the OFF and ON states, a third situation is included, considering the PIN diode threshold region when the FSS becomes practically transparent, which is an interesting feature with potential applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it