MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789376023 · doi:10.4095/306493

The Bells Corner borehole geophysical calibration facility of the Geological Survey of Canada

2018· report· en· W2789376023 on OpenAlexaffabout
H Crow, Kevin Brewer, T Cartwright, B Dietiker, A J -M Pugin, H A J Russell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoreholeGeophysical surveyGeologyCalibrationSeismologyGeological surveyGeophysicsGeotechnical engineeringStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calibration sites provide important opportunities for the standardization of downhole instrument response. Using quantitative physical properties from borehole cores, calibration adds value to projects by allowing for data consistency from hole-to-hole, system-to-system, and importantly, over time. The Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) maintains the Bells Corners Calibration Facilities near Ottawa, Canada, which is available to all members of the geophysical logging community. In the late 1970's and early 1980's, the GSC developed quantitative borehole calibration facilities, consisting of model calibration boreholes for gamma-ray spectral logging probes with known concentrations of potassium (K), uranium (U), and thorium (Th), density calibration blocks for gamma-gamma tools, and six deep boreholes in Palaeozoic sedimentary (sandstone, dolomite, shale) and Precambrian (granitic) bedrock. The deep boreholes were continuously cored, range in depth from 120 - 300 m, and are sited within a 10 to 100 m triangular configuration for cross-hole capabilities. The published downhole log suite includes spectral gamma-ray, density, neutron, induced polarization (IP), self potential (SP), resistivity, acoustic velocity, magnetic susceptibility, and fluid temperature. In recent years, new GSC calibration datasets have been collected in these wells including high-resolution televiewer imaging, acoustic velocities, and high-resolution temperature and fluid conductivity. An effort is underway to update downhole and petrophysical core measurements, maintain standardization for traditional downhole instruments, and conduct demonstration projects with newly developed downhole instruments so that sites remain relevant to members of the groundwater, geotechnical, and extractive sectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207