MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789397493 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v43i11a06

New vaccine administration practice recommendations from the Canadian Immunization Guide

2017· article· en· W2789397493 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntramuscular injections and effects
Canadian institutionsHealth PEIUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityMcGill UniversityPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsMedicineImmunizationAdvisory committeeAgency (philosophy)Administration (probate law)AuditFamily medicineImmunologyPolitical scienceBusinessPublic administrationImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: (CIG) is published online by the Public Health Agency of Canada and summarizes guidance on vaccines for human use into a single resource. Chapters are reviewed and updated on a regular basis. Vaccine administration is a critical part of any immunization program. Recently, the CIG chapter on vaccine administration practices was updated. OBJECTIVE: To provide highlights of recent changes to the Vaccine Administration Practices chapter of the CIG. APPROACH: Vaccine-specific guidance in the CIG is based on National Committee on Immunization (NACI) and Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) recommendations as well as new recommendations developed by the CIG Working Group members and NACI Secretariat technical staff. New recommendations are based on a review of the literature, including systematic reviews when available, a review of guidance provided by other National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups and expert opinion. The revisions are approved by the Working Group chair, as well as NACI. RESULTS: Highlights of new recommendations include the following: vaccine providers should adhere to jurisdictional or organizational policies and procedures regarding combining the contents of multi-dose vials; clinical judgement should be used when selecting needle length for intramuscular injections that takes into account the vaccine recipient's weight, gender and age; filter needles are not recommended for vaccine administration as they may filter out active ingredients such as adjuvants; an injection site other than in an area where lymphatic drainage may be impaired should be considered; there is no evidence or theoretical rationale for avoiding injection through a tattoo or superficial birthmark; and immunization pain management strategies have now been developed for all ages. CONCLUSION: Recommendations in vaccine administration practices have recently been changed in some important ways. The Public Health Agency of Canada is committed to providing information on immunization in an easily accessible, reader-friendly format for healthcare providers and policy-makers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it