MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789411207 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2804759

New Results on Sliding-Mode Control for Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Multiagent Systems

2018· article· en· W2789411207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)WeightingFuzzy logicMathematical optimizationMathematicsController (irrigation)Constraint (computer-aided design)Fuzzy control systemComputer scienceControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the sliding-mode control (SMC) problem of Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy multiagent systems (MASs). A cooperative fuzzy-based dynamical sliding-mode (SM) controller is designed and the overall closed-loop T-S fuzzy MAS is constructed. A new model transformation method for T-S fuzzy MASs is presented to transform the fuzzy weighting matrix into a set of fuzzy weighting scalars. By applying the method of linear matrix inequality, a general stability analysis approach for T-S fuzzy MASs is proposed. Moreover, the energy-cost constraint problem is studied by using the linear quadratic regulator method. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed theoretical approaches and the improved performance compared to existing results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it