MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789449378 · doi:10.7202/1044021ar

La communication au sein de foyers familiaux. Une nouvelle preuve de la pertinence d’une analyse relationnelle

2018· article· fr· W2789449378 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Paul Jalbert, Simon Laflamme

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Realism in Sociology
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous rappelons quelques éléments d’une analyse relationnelle en confrontant son appareil conceptuel à celui qui est à l’oeuvre dans les modélisations qui ont pour centre l’individu. Nous énumérons quelques travaux empiriques qui, entre autres, ont relativisé la pertinence de la catégorie d’intention, catégorie qui est prééminente dans la plupart des études qui se focalisent sur l’individu. Enfin, nous rapportons les résultats d’un nouveau travail empirique qui, dans le prolongement des précédents, met en valeur l’analyse relationnelle. Ce travail repose sur l’observation des échanges qui ont cours au sein de foyers familiaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.069
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles perspectives en sciences socialesSame topicCritical Realism in SociologyFrench-language works237,207