MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789454435 · doi:10.1109/ipta.2017.8310120

Effective keyframe extraction from RGB and RGB-D video sequences

2017· article· en· W2789454435 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomatic summarizationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRGB color modelComputer visionHistogramFeature extractionFilter (signal processing)Digital videoPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Frame (networking)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid increase in digital video content demands effective summarization techniques, specially with the creation of RGBD videos. Keyframe extraction significantly reduces the amount of raw data in a video sequence. In this paper, we present a two-stage (histogram and filtering) keyframe extraction algorithm applicable on RGB and RGBD videos. In the first stage, RGB and depth histogram similarities of consecutive frames are computed and candidate keyframes are extracted. In the second stage, we filter neighboring candidate keyframes based on the MAD of their Euclidean distance and their MSE. Subjective and objective experimental results show our algorithm effectively extracts keyframes from both RGB and RGBD videos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207