MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789454648 · doi:10.20381/ruor-7755

The record of episodic high-energy sedimentation in the western Oak Ridges Moraine, southern Ontario.

2001· dissertation· en· W2789454648 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hazen Algar John. Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoraineGeologySedimentationGeomorphologyPaleontologyGeochemistryArchaeologyGeographyGlacial periodSediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 160 km long Oak Ridges Moraine in southern Ontario has been interpreted as an interlobate moraine, a subaerial braidplain-defaic deposit, a subglacially formed ridge, or a polygenetic landform of subglacial and proglacial deposits. Because of these significant differences a detailed sedimentological study is needed in order to provide an improved depositional model. This study of the western 40 km of the moraine in the Humber River watershed challenges the concept that it was deposited from seasonal meltwater discharges, climatic modulated ice-marginal fluctuations or in an interlobate position. Instead it is interpreted to have formed in response to changes in the ice-sheet during deglaciation associated with subglacial ponding, episodic and catastrophic subglacial jokulhlaup discharge and seasonal meltwater discharge. The moraine probably formed as the ice-sheet profile and glacial hydraulic system re-equilibrated to the presence of a thinned ice-sheet and a subglacial lake in the Lake Ontario basin. The Oak Ridges Moraine is interpreted to have been deposited in three discrete stages that record sedimentation from both high-energy and low-energy depositional processes. Stage I consists mostly of massive and diffusely-graded sand that is up to 50 m thick and forms the lowest tunnel channel infill. It was deposited rapidly from hyperconcentrated flows some distance downflow of a hydraulic jump that developed as jokulhlaup flow discharged from tunnel channels into a subglacial lake in the Lake Ontario basin. Low energy basinal sedimentation of Stage II is recorded by the upward increase in thin normally graded fine-sand, silt, and clay laminae forming varves. Stage III is characterized by rapid facies changes associated with subaqueous fan, esker and basinal sedimentation. Proximal fan sediment consists of heterogeneous gravel with sand intraclasts and planar-stratified gravel. Immediately downflow the supercritical to subcritical flow transition is recorded by steep-wailed scours and diffusely-graded infill. Farther downflow the subcritical flow region of the fan is dominated by planar cross-stratified medium sand, climbing medium scale cross-stratified sand and small-scale cross-laminated fine sand. Based on an incomplete verve chronology and general evidence of rapid and voluminous sedimentation it is estimated that the moraine was deposited over a short period of time, maybe as little as 100 years. This study provides an additional demonstration of the value of detailed sedimentological studies to advancing understanding of Laurentide meltwater and deglacial processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207