MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2789476701 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.115

A115 CLINICAL, RADIOGRAPHIC, AND ENDOSCOPIC REMISSION WITH VEDOLIZUMAB TREATMENT IN CROHN’S DISEASE

2018· article· en· W2789476701 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paulo Gustavo Kotze, Christopher Ma, Abdulelah Almutairdi, Ahmed Al‐Darmaki, Shane Devlin, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Cynthia H. Seow, Kerri L. Novak, Cathy Lu, José G. Ferraz, Michael J. Stewart, Michelle Buresi, M. Mathivanan, Joan Heatherington, M Martin, Remo Panaccione

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineCrohn's diseaseInternal medicineMaintenance therapyGastroenterologyRegimenClinical trialSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyDiseaseChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vedolizumab is a gut-specific alpha-4-beta-7 integrin antagonist that has demonstrated efficacy in induction and maintenance of clinical response and remission in Crohn’s disease randomized controlled trials. To evaluate the symptomatic and objective response and remission rates achieved with vedolizumab therapy in Crohn’s disease in the real-world setting. A retrospective cohort study was performed at the University of Calgary of adult (≥18 years) CD patients receiving vedolizumab induction between 2012 and 2017. All patients received standard induction therapy with vedolizumab 300mg IV at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and were subsequently advanced onto a scheduled maintenance vedolizumab IV regimen. The primary outcome was achievement of clinical or objective remission at 3, 6, and 12 months after induction. Clinical remission was defined by complete absence of symptoms and no need for corticosteroids. Objective remission was defined by achievement of steroid-free endoscopic mucosal healing or complete normalization of radiographic appearance on contrast-enhanced ultrasound or CT/MR enterography. We identified 122 CD patients treated with vedolizumab. Mean follow-up was 43.4 weeks (SD 30.8 weeks). 68.9% (84/122) of patients had previously failed anti-TNF therapy; 18.9% (23/122) of patients had failed at least three previous biologic therapies. Steroid-free clinical remission at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months was 19.8% (22/111), 22.1% (21/95), and 22.1% (15/68), respectively. Steroid-free objective remission occurred in 11.5% (6/52), 21.2% (14/66), and 18.9% (7/37) patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Mucosal healing on endoscopy was achieved by 22.2% (6/27), 33.3% (14/42), and 25.9% (7/27) of patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Thirty-three patients (27.0%) required dose escalation during maintenance therapy to 300mg IV every 4 weeks; 23 patients required dose escalation to optimize primary response and 10 patients required dose escalation for secondary loss of response. An adverse event was reported in 35 patients (28.7%). The most common adverse events were infections (16/122, 6.6%) and infusion reactions (8/122, 6.6%). Serious adverse events requiring drug discontinuation or hospitalization were reported in 8 patients (6.6%). Two deaths occurred in the cohort: one patient developed cholangiocarcinoma in the context of pre-existing primary sclerosing cholangitis and a second patient died from metastatic renal cell carcinoma which had been diagnosed prior to vedolizumab. In this cohort of patients with highly refractory CD, vedolizumab was effective for inducing steroid-free clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic remission. Figure 1: Clinical and objective response and remission with vedolizumab None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→