MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789530891 · doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2017.0581

High‐efficiency wireless power transfer system for 3D, unstationary free‐positioning and multi‐object charging

2018· article· en· W2789530891 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Zhang, Tengyuan Zhang, Qiuquan Guo, Lingmin Shao, Naibo Zhang, Xiangliang Jin, Jun Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Electric Power Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless power transferMaximum power transfer theoremWirelessObject (grammar)Computer scienceTransfer (computing)Power (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless power transfer (WPT) has become increasingly widespread in recent years, ranging from electric vehicles, portable consumer electronics, and implantable biomedical devices to flexible/stretchable electronics. The authors here present a WPT system based on the maximum efficiency design principle. Utilising the properties of Helmholtz coils, a near‐uniform 3D volume electromagnetic field is generated making it possible to transfer power to multiple devices simultaneously with no requirement of orientation and/or alignment. The system can also provide continuous wireless power to multiple devices even when they are moving, with an efficiency of up to 87%. An automatic frequency tracing technique was developed to compensate for the resonant frequency shifting issue encountered when the number of loadings changes. Meanwhile, a multi‐load decoupling control system was also developed, such that each secondary coil receives consistent energy without being affected by the addition or removal of another receiving coil(s). As a proof of concept, the authors successfully charged various numbers of mobile phones simultaneously and transmitted power to single/multiple moving devices wirelessly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Electric Power ApplicationsSame topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207