MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2789619033 · doi:10.1117/12.2290844

Monolithic CMOS-compatible zero-index metamaterials (Conference Presentation)

2018· article· en· W2789619033 on OpenAlexaff
Daryl I. Vulis, Yang Li, Orad Reshef, Philip Camayd-Muñoz, Mei Yin, Shota Kita, Marko Lončar, Eric Mazur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialMaterials scienceOpticsRefractive indexOptoelectronicsTransformation opticsPhotonicsSuperlensPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zero-index metamaterials exhibit exotic optical properties such as uniform spatial phase and infinite wavelength. These extreme properties can be utilized for integrated-optics applications. However, practical implementation of zero-index-based photonic devices requires compatibility with complementary metallic-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technologies. Zero-index metamaterials have been previously demonstrated in both out-of-plane and integrated configurations by taking advantage of a photonic Dirac-cone dispersion at the center of the Brillouin zone. Such metamaterials feature a square matrix of high aspect-ratio pillars and offer matched impedance through simultaneously zero effective permittivity and permeability. However, these configurations are inherently incompatible with integrated devices due to out-of-plane excitation, metallic inclusions, or high aspect-ratio structures. This work demonstrates a CMOS-compatible zero-index metamaterial consisting of a square array of air-holes in a 220-nm-thick silicon-on-insulator wafer. To experimentally verify the refractive index, we measure the angle of refraction of light through a triangular prism consisting of the metamaterial. The index is extracted using Snell's Law to verify a refractive index of zero at a wavelength of 1625 nm. Through the air-hole in silicon configuration, the proportion of silicon is increased as compared to designs based on high aspect-ratio silicon pillars. This enables a platform with low-aspect-ratio features, improved confinement of transverse electric polarized light, as well as the original benefit of matched impedance. Featuring a trivial monolithic fabrication and capacity for integration with the expansive library of existing silicon photonic devices, this metamaterial enables implementation of proposed zero-index devices and offers a powerful platform for exploring the future applications of zero-index materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→