MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789637967 · doi:10.22230/cjc.2018v43n1a3315

From the Natural to the Manmade Environment: The Shifting Advertising Practices of Canada’s Oil Sands Industry

2018· article· en· W2789637967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Communication · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicConservation Techniques and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsPetroleum industryThematic analysisNatural (archaeology)Political scienceAdvertisingGeographyQualitative researchEngineeringSociologyBusinessCartographyArchaeologySocial scienceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background This article uses basic thematic content analysis (n = 80) and qualitative visual analysis to examine how still advertisements produced by Canada’s oil sands industry changed between 2006 and 2015.Analysis The article argues that early industry advertisement campaigns had a strong environment focus with the objective of linking industry’s interest in oil with a visual commitment to preserving, reclaiming, and restoring the natural environment.Conclusions and implications In subsequent campaigns, however, industry is shown to undertake a multidimensional campaigning strategy, the most prominent of which is lifestyle messaging that celebrates oil’s ubiquity in consumer culture. The shift to “selling oil sands without oil sands” highlights the need for scholars to widen the aperture of what is traditionally considered environmental imagery from the natural environment to the human-made environment.Contexte Cet article utilise une analyse de contenu thématique de base (n = 80) et une analyse visuelle qualitative pour examiner comment les announces statiques produites par l’industrie canadienne des sables bitumineux ont changé entre 2006 et 2015.Analyse L’article soutient que les premières campagnes de publicité de l’industrie étaient fortement axées sur l’environnement dans le but de lier l’intérêt de l’industrie pétrolière à un engagement visant à préserver, récupérer et restaurer l’environnement naturel.Conclusions et implications Dans les campagnes subséquentes, cependant, l’industrie a démontré qu’elle entreprenait une stratégie de campagne multidimensionnelle, dont la plus importante est la messagerie de style de vie qui célèbre l’omniprésence du pétrole dans la culture de consommation. Le passage à la «vente de sables bitumineux sans sables bitumineux» souligne la nécessité pour les chercheurs d’élargir l’ouverture de ce qui est traditionnellement considéré comme une imagerie environnementale, de l’environnement naturel à l’environnement créé par l’homme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it