MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789667363 · doi:10.1071/aseg2018abt6_1f

Large Scale 3D Airborne Electromagnetic Inversion - Recent Technical Improvements

2018· article· en· W2789667363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia HospitalGeoscience BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)Computer sciencePolygon meshSuiteSoftware suiteComputational scienceLeverage (statistics)Frequency domainSoftwareGeologyComputer engineeringComputer graphics (images)GeographySeismologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D airborne electromagnetic (AEM) inversion has routinely been applied to frequency and time-domain problems over the past few years, however this research field continues to undergo rapid improvements with the implementation of new ideas and faster computational resources. To keep pace with these developments, we have rewritten our 3D AEM inversion software suite to leverage the rapid growth in parallel processing, and to create a flexible inversion framework capable of standard inversion plus many additional types: joint, cooperative or parametric, all on semi-structured octree meshes. Our resulting framework further improves recent key ideas such as the decoupling of forward meshes from the inverse mesh, to allow the forward problem to be easily distributed on separate nodes of a cluster for fast and efficient modelling of the fields.We present two large-scale field examples, one in the frequency domain and one in the time domain. The frequency domain survey demonstrates our ability to recover thin conductors, in this case representing orogenic gold targets, across a large region (40km x 35km). The time domain example focuses on a smaller area within a larger survey area where mapping groundwater resources is the primary goal. Here the fine-scale results are compared to a 1D inversion, and we see a good correlation between the 3D and 1D results due to an approximately 1D layered-earth environment. However we see a removal of 1D artifacts in the neighbourhood of vertical conductors and topographic changes in the 3D result with the added bonus of information between lines in which decisions regarding groundwater management can be made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it