MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2789697442

Proprietes rheologiques de suspensions aqueuses de cellulose nanocristalline modifiee ou non

2016· article· fr· W2789697442 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gilles Lenfant

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsHumanitiesChemistryMolecular biologyPhilosophyPhysicsBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Lucie et Alice… A Grand-père, What would you think if I sang out of tune, Would you stand up and walk out on me?Lend me your ears and I'll sing you a song And I'll try not to sing out of key Oh, I get by with a little help from my friends With a little help from my friends... ("With a little help from my friends", The BEATLES, 1967) REMERCIEMENTS Je voudrais d'abord remercier mes parents pour leur soutien moral durant ces quatre dernières années, et ce, malgré les 6000 kms de distance qui nous séparaient.Des remerciements à tous mes amis dont plus particulièrement : a Bruno pour son soutien moral, sa présence amicale et son envie constante de savoir élever les autres pour tirer le meilleur d'eux-mêmes; a Giovanni-Antonio Natale qui a été le meilleur « frère » de rhéologie que je pouvais rencontrer pour son soutien, ses critiques et conseils; a Marion qui a été le vecteur de tant de belles rencontres et de belles choses dans ma vie à Montréal.Une pensée pour Maude pour les moments magique de musique chant/guitare que nous avons partagé!Merci à Claire pour les longs messages de soutien et d'écoute réciproque d'Italie!Et je n'oublie pas : Nathanaëlle,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)→Same topicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies→French-language works237,207→