MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Transcriptome-wide analysis of alternative splicing events in bladder cancer: Novel biomarkers discovery for early diagnosis.

2018· article· en· W2789745920 on OpenAlexaff
Claudio Jeldres, Sabrina Bouchard, Michel Carmel, Patrick O. Richard, Robert Sabbagh, Martin Bisaillon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlternative splicingRNA splicingComputational biologyGeneSpliceosomeBiologyBladder cancerTranscriptomeIntronGene expressionBioinformaticsMedicineMessenger RNACancer researchCancerGeneticsRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

483 Background: Cystoscopy, an invasive, painful and expensive method, is currently the main clinical tool for new diagnosis and disease recurrence detection of bladder cancer (BCa). The need for new biomarkers discovery that is costless, sensitive and specific is urgent. This project aims to study and compare alternative splicing events (ASE) in BCa tissues and normal bladder tissues and ultimately, identify specific spliced events coding for proteins detectable in urine by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Methods: In this study, alterations to the global RNA splicing landscape of cellular genes were investigated in a large-scale screen from 408 BCa tissues and 19 normal tissues provided by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Three statistical thresholds were used to determine substantial modifications. All events showing a p-value<0.05 and a level of expression ≥ 50 transcripts per million; -10 ≥ Δ percent splice index ≤10; and a q-value<0.05 were conserved. Next, mRNA expression levels between cancer and normal tissues were compared for all splicing factors and the spliceosome to determine the impact of gene dysregulation on alternative splicing events. Using multiple bioinformatic platforms such as EASANA, MultAlin, ExPasy, NLS Mapper and Pfam, splicing events responsible for significant protein structural changes between cancer and healthy tissue were selected. From this sample chosen, ASEs coding for proteins that could be detected in urine were conserved. Results: Our study identifies modifications in the alternative splicing patterns of 107 transcripts encoded by 97 genes. STRING analysis revealed that many of the gene products interact either directly or indirectly with each other (enrichment p-value = 1x10-10). 61 ASEs are causing important protein changes from which 27 can be detected in urine. Finally, 16 ASEs coding for easily recognizable peptide sequences in urine represented significant targets for potential BCa biomarkers. Conclusions: The TCGA data show the relevance to investigate alternative splicing events in bladder cancer. 16 significant events were detectable in urine and may potentially discriminate between presence or absence of bladder cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→