Event-Triggered 3D Needle Control Using a Reduced-Order Computationally Efficient Bicycle Model in a Constrained Optimization Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long flexible needles used in percutaneous procedures such as biopsy and brachytherapy deflect during insertion, thus reducing needle tip placement accuracy. This paper presents a surgeon-in-the-loop system to automatically steer the needle during manual insertion and compensate for needle deflection using an event-triggered controller. A reduced-order kinematic bicycle model incorporating needle tip measurement data from ultrasound images is used to determine steering actions required to minimize needle deflection. To this end, an analytic solution to the reduced-order bicycle model, which is shown to be more computationally efficient than a discrete-step implementation of the same model, is derived and utilized for needle tip trajectory prediction. These needle tip trajectory predictions are used online to optimize the insertion depths (event-trigger points) for steering actions such that needle deflection is minimized. The use of the analytic model and the event-triggered controller also allows for limiting the number and extent of needle rotations (to reduce tissue trauma) in a constrained optimization framework. The system was tested experimentally in three different ex-vivo tissue phantoms with a surgeon-in-the-loop needle insertion device. The proposed needle steering controller was shown to keep the average needle deflection within 0.47 [Formula: see text] 0.21[Formula: see text]mm at the final insertion depth of 120[Formula: see text]mm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".