A Fine-Grained Stateful Data Analytics Method Based on Resilient State Table
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes how stateful data analytic frameworks have emerged to provide fresh and low-latency results for big data processing. At present, it is desired to achieve the fine-grained data model in Spark data processing framework. However, Spark adopts coarse-grained data model in order to facilitate parallelization, it is challenging in dealing with the fine-grained data access in stateful data analytics. In this paper, the authors introduce a fine-grained stateful data component, Resilient State Table (RST), to Spark framework. For filling the gap between the coarse-grained data model in Spark and the fine-grained data access requirements in stateful data analytics, they devise the programming model of RST which interacts with Spark's coarse-grained memory representation seamlessly, and enable users to query/update the state entries in fine granularity with Spark-like programming interfaces. Performance evaluation experiments in various application fields demonstrate that their proposed solution achieves the improvements in latency, fault-tolerance, as well as scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it