«Nuestra única esperanza es el apocalipsis»: Marshall McLuhan, antimodernismo católico y la reforma educativa de los años 1960
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El pensador canadiense Marshall McLuhan es reconocido por ser uno de los grandes teóricos y analistas de la modernidad en el período posterior a 1945. Sin embargo, el pensamiento moderno de McLuhan tenía cierta complejidad. Constantemente comprometido con la modernidad, su defensa se orientaba a intentar debilitarla a favor de una concepción premoderna del mundo inspirada por su intensa relación con el catolicismo. McLuhan era, de hecho, un gran antimodernista. Un posicionamiento que resulta irónico si se observa el papel tan destacado que McLuhan desempeñó como «experto» en la modernidad y en la educación en el Departamento de Educación del gobierno progresista en la década de 1960 en Ontario (Canadá). Este trabajo parte de esa relación paradójica para abordar la complejidad de las ideas interconectadas de McLuhan a favor y en contra de la modernidad, el catolicismo y la reforma de la escuela, al tiempo que aporta claridad con respecto a su estatus único como intelectual público durante la década de los años sesenta en Canadá.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".