MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789834316 · doi:10.1109/ccwc.2018.8301714

Vehicle make and model recognition using random forest classification for intelligent transportation systems

2018· article· en· W2789834316 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Asif Manzoor, Yasser Morgan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle License Plate Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale-invariant feature transformComputer scienceIntelligent transportation systemHistogramRandom forestHistogram of oriented gradientsFeature extractionArtificial intelligenceCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionIntelligent decision support systemMachine learningData miningImage (mathematics)EngineeringTransport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) has many real world applications. ITS applications help in better traffic management and enable us to make more secure, intelligent, smart decisions regarding traffic networks. Automatic Surveillance and monitoring is required for many ITS applications. Vehicle Make and Model Recognition (VMMR) can be used to recognize the vehicles' identity. We have designed a Random Forest based VMMR system in this work to identify the Make and Model of a vehicle. The proposed VMMR system is evaluated using a publicly available dataset. Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) are used for the representation of vehicle images. The proposed method identifies the vehicles with good recognition rates and results are discussed in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicle License Plate RecognitionFrench-language works237,207