Round-robin differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with twisted photons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantum key distribution (QKD) offers the possibility for two individuals to communicate a securely encrypted message. A common technical requirement is the monitoring of signal disturbance in a QKD system to bound the information leakage toward an unwanted eavesdropper. Recently, the round-robin differential-phase-shift (RRDPS) protocol, which encodes bits of information in a high-dimensional state space, was proposed to introduce an upper bound on the amount of Eve's information based on dimensionality of prepared quantum states and randomized measurement settings. Since its introduction, many realizations of the RRDPS protocol were demonstrated using trains of coherent pulses (time bin encoding). Given that this realization of the protocol requires active and random choice of many delays in a delayed Mach-Zehnder interferometer, its implementation can be technically demanding. Here, we propose and experimentally demonstrate an implementation of the RRDPS protocol using the photonic orbital angular momentum degree of freedom in dimensions $L=3$--8, 16, 32, and 64. In particular, we show that Alice's generation stage and Bob's detection stage can each be reduced to a single phase element, greatly simplifying the implementation. Our scheme offers a practical path to using RRDPS protocol in free-space quantum channels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".