MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789868711 · doi:10.1259/bjr.20170814

18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma being considered for multimodality therapy: experience of a tertiary referral center

2018· article· en· W2789868711 on OpenAlexaff
Hugh S Elliott, Ur Metser, Marc de Perrot, John Cho, Penelope A. Bradbury, Patrick Veit‐Haibach, Douglas Hussey

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Radiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoWomen's College HospitalMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHistopathologyRadiologyRetrospective cohort studyMesotheliomaRadiation therapyPositron emission tomographyStage (stratigraphy)Tertiary referral centreNuclear medicineSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare the N- and M-staging accuracy of PET vs CT, as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) being considered for multimodality therapy in a tertiary referral center. A secondary aim was to assess survival outcome of patients chosen for surgical management after PET. METHODS: A retrospective, single institution comparison of PET and CT was performed in patients with histologically proven MPM being considered for multimodality therapy. Performance of each modality in identifying nodal category and presence or absence of distant metastases was abstracted from electronic patient records. The standard of reference was surgical histopathology for nodal stage and histopathology or clinical and imaging follow-up of >3 months for distant metastases. RESULTS: There were 101 eligible patients with complete data sets; 82 males, 19 females with a mean age of 66.6 years (range: 39-85). Most patients (n = 68) had epithelioid histology. Surgery was performed in 61/101 patients (60.4%), most of whom had multimodality therapy. Nodal category was concordant to surgical histopathology in 38/60 patients (63.3%) on PET, compared to 27/60 (45%) on CT (p = 0.001). For detection of ≥N1 disease only, PET and CT correctly staged 15/37 patients (40.5%) and 8/37 (21.6%), respectively (p = 0.023). Distant metastases were identified uniquely on PET in eight patients and on CT only in one patient. Overall, PET and CT correctly identified 11/12 (91.6%) and 4/12 (33.3%) patients with distant metastases, respectively (p = 0.0391). CONCLUSION: PET identifies significantly more patients with nodal or distant metastatic disease than CT and may contribute to more appropriate selection of patients with MPM for surgery or multimodality therapy. Advances in knowledge: In patients with MPM, fludeoxyglucose-PET/CT detects significantly more patients with distant metastases than CT. PET/CT can help in the selection of patients with MPM who would benefit from surgery or multimodality therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of RadiologySame topicOccupational and environmental lung diseasesFrench-language works237,207