A333 REMOVAL OF A MIGRATED BILIARY STENT IMPACTED IN THE COLONIC WALL: A CASE DESCRIPTION OF ENDOSCOPIC REPAIR.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endoscopically placed biliary stents are commonly used for the treatment of pancreaticobiliary disorders. Plastic biliary stent migration is a complication that is well described in the literature and is estimated to occur in 5 to 10% of cases. The stents are usually expelled without incident within a few weeks if they migrate into the intestine. Perforation of the GI tract secondary to stent migration is a rare event occurring in less than 1 % of cases. Reported cases of perforation secondary to stent migration have required surgery for stent removal and repair. Advances in therapeutic endoscopy has led to an increase in potential complications including iatrogenic perforations. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in the use of clips and endo loops for the closure of iatrogenic colonic perforations, and for closing defects following large polypectomy Developing techniques to manage these complications is crucial to further advancement of the field. To describe a case of perforation secondary to biliary stent migration that was repaired endoscopically. Case report and review of the literature. The case is that of a 90-year-old female known for recurrent biliary obstruction secondary to gallstones and Mirizzi’s syndrome which had been managed conservatively for many years with sequential biliary stent exchanges via ERCP. The patient initially presented to hospital with sudden onset severe abdominal pain following a week of intermittent post-prandial pain. A CT scan identified a migrated biliary stent in the ascending colon with one end through the colonic wall and surrounding fat stranding, which was concerning for a perforation. The patient was admitted under the general surgery service for treatment with intravenous antibiotics and observation. Her condition stabilised and her pain subsided within 24 hours, however the stent remained lodged in the colonic wall as visualized on serial abdominal x-rays. In view of multiple comorbidities that precluded surgery, a colonoscopy was performed on day 4 of her admission. We identified the stent impacted in the wall of the ascending colon. It was dislodged with the use of a snare, leaving behind a defect in the colonic wall. We then proceeded to endoscopically close the defect with the use of 3 clips. The perforation was further approximated using an endo loop around the 3 clips, to bring the mucosa closer together. The patient recovered uneventfully and was sent home on oral antibiotics. This is the first description of a migrated plastic biliary stent removed endoscopically with repair of the colonic perforation using a previously described endoscopic technique. Our case further emphasizes the potential for endoscopic repair of gastro-intestinal perforations, especially in non-surgical candidates with multiple comorbidities. Endoscopic repair of mucosal defect using clips and an endo-loop None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".