MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789875227 · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2815036

A New Fault Prognosis of MFS System Using Integrated Extended Kalman Filter and Bayesian Method

2018· article· en· W2789875227 on OpenAlexaff
Mojtaba Kordestani, M. Foad Samadi, Mehrdad Saif, K. Khorasani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterKalman filterResidualRecursive Bayesian estimationBayesian probabilityFault (geology)Control theory (sociology)Path (computing)Transformation (genetics)Computer scienceCondition-based maintenanceFault detection and isolationPrognosticsEngineeringControl systemControl engineeringReliability engineeringData miningAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new fault prognosis approach for a multifunctional spoiler (MFS) system which employs an extended Kalman filter (EKF) and Bayesian theorem method for prognosis. The MFS is an important part of an aircraft spoiler control system (SCS), and thus, prognosis and health management (PHM) of this system improves the safety of the aircraft. To monitor the system, residual estimation based on the EKF method is utilized to observe the progress of the failure in the system. Then, a new measure is introduced by using a transformation to estimate degradation path (DP) of the failure in the system. Furthermore, a new recursive Bayesian method is invoked to predict the RUL of the system using the estimated DP data. Finally, for performance assessment, relative accuracy (RA) is utilized to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207