MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789880737 · doi:10.21037/aes.2018.ab040

AB040. Pou2f1/2 are required for the specification of cone photoreceptors in the developing retina

2018· article· en· W2789880737 on OpenAlexaff
Awais Javed, Pierre Mattar, Michel Cayouette

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Eye Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCone (formal languages)RetinaOphthalmologyNeuroscienceComputer scienceBiologyMedicineProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rods and cones are critical for light detection. Although there has been considerable work done in elucidating the molecular mechanisms involved in rod development, not much is known about how the cone cell fate decision is made by the multipotent retinal progenitor cells during development. Analysis of the promoter regions of Nrl and trβ2, rod and cone differentiation factors respectively, revealed DNA binding motifs of two POU-domain containing transcription factors, Pou2f1 and Pou2f2. Preliminary experiments showed that Pou2f1/2 are expressed during the peak of cone genesis in the embryonic retina. Therefore, we hypothesize that Pou2f1/2 specify cone cell fate in the developing retina. Methods: We used immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization to establish the spatiotemporal expression of Pou2f1/2 during retinogenesis. We performed in vivo electroporation in post-natal mice to misexpress Pou2f1/2 and used antibodies specific to proteins expressed in cones such as Rxrγ and S-opsin to count cones. Using ex vivo electroporation of embryonic retinal explants, we knocked out Pou2f1 and Pou2f2 using CRISPR/Cas9 gRNAs at the peak of cone production window. Finally, we transfected post-natal retinal explants with a combination of regulatory elements of Nrl or thrb with control backbone vector, Pou2f1 or Pou2f2 using electroporation. Results: We found that Pou2f1/2 are expressed in retinal progenitor cells in the developing retina and subsequently in the differentiated cones. Pou2f1/2 misexpression outside the cone genesis window led to an increase in cones at the expense of rods. Pou2f1/2 indel knockouts generated by CRISPR/Cas9 gRNAs led to a decrease in cones and a converse increase in rods. Finally, we found that Pou2f1/2 activate the cis-regulatory module (CRM) of the thrb gene and repress the activity of the CRM of Nrl. Conclusions: These results uncover novel players that establish the complex gene regulatory network for cone photoreceptor fate specification in the retinal progenitor cells. We anticipate that this work should help us devise improved replacement therapies in the future utilizing stem cells for retinal degenerative diseases such as aged-related macular degeneration (AMD) and Stargardt’s disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Eye ScienceSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207