MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789883480 · doi:10.23977/cpcs.2017.21002

Research on Hierarchical Scheduling of Operational Operation of Polar Meteorological Satellite Ground System

2017· article· en· W2789883480 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhaohui Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing Performance and Communication systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic priority schedulingComputer scienceFair-share schedulingTwo-level schedulingFixed-priority pre-emptive schedulingRate-monotonic schedulingEarliest deadline first schedulingScheduling (production processes)Round-robin schedulingFlow shop schedulingLottery schedulingReal-time computingDistributed computingEngineeringScheduleOperating systemOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meteorological satellite ground application system business operation scheduling is the core of the entire business operation, directly related to the entire system operating efficiency. This paper designs a hierarchical satellite terrestrial system business operation scheduling method. First of all, the satellite service is classified into first-level and second-level scheduling. Then, based on the hierarchical scheduling, task scheduling and scheduled scheduling are implemented. Through hierarchical scheduling and planning and scheduling to achieve the entire system job scheduling, thereby enhancing the efficiency of task scheduling and improve the overall system operating efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing Performance and Communication systemsSame topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207