MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789886422 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2808237

Low Complexity and Fast Processing Algorithms for V2I Massive MIMO Uplink Detection

2018· article· en· W2789886422 on OpenAlexafffund
Fan Jiang, Cheng Li, Zijun Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMIMOComputer scienceTelecommunications linkComputational complexity theoryAlgorithmIterative methodBlock (permutation group theory)Efficient energy useLow latency (capital markets)Computer engineeringReal-time computingChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fast development of intelligent transport systems requires high-rate communications, high energy efficiency, and low latency. One promising solution to meet the requirements is to adopt the massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technique. The massive MIMO architecture is attractive to multiple vehicles on the road for vehicle-to-infrastructure access as large-scale antennas can be deployed at the roadside unit. Besides, massive MIMO systems can significantly improve the system spectrum efficiency and energy efficiency. However, the benefits are achieved at the cost of high computational complexity and long processing delay even with linear detection methods. In this paper, we propose low complexity and fast processing algorithms to address those issues. The proposed schemes transform the large-scale matrix inverse problems into solving linear equations. We then introduce iterative methods to solve linear equations. To speed up the updating process in iterative method, we utilize the properties of block matrix, and perform the updating process on a small size block independently. The independent processing progress can be paralleled, which greatly reduces the overall processing time. We also evaluate the performance of the proposed schemes in terms of the probability that the convergence conditions are met, and the system bit error rate. The results show that the proposed schemes achieve good system performance but at low complexity and latency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207