MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789901503 · doi:10.1049/iet-its.2017.0329

Deep learning‐based real‐time fine‐grained pedestrian recognition using stream processing

2018· article· en· W2789901503 on OpenAlexaff
Weishan Zhang, Zhichao Wang, Xin Liu, Haoyun Sun, Jiehan Zhou, Yan Liu, Wenjuan Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Intelligent Transport Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesPetroChina Innovation Foundation
KeywordsPedestrianComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePedestrian detectionDeep learningStream processingComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Real-time computingEngineeringTransport engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real‐time recognition of pedestrian details can be very important in emergency situations for security reasons, such as traffic accidents identification from traffic video. However, this is challenging due to the needed accuracy of video data mining, and also the performance for real‐time video processing. Here, the authors propose a solution for fine‐grained pedestrian recognition in monitoring scenarios using deep learning and stream processing cloud computing, which is called DRPRS (deep learning‐based real‐time fine‐grained pedestrian recognition using stream processing). The authors design an improved convolutional neural network (CNN) network called fine‐CNN, which is a nine‐layer neural network for detailed pedestrian recognition. In DRPRS, a pedestrian in a surveillance video is segmented and fine‐grainedly recognised using improved single‐shot detector and several fine‐CNNs. DRPRS is supported by parallel mechanisms provided by Apache Storm stream processing framework. In addition, in order to further improve the recognition performance, a GPU‐based scheduling algorithm is proposed to make full use of GPU resources in a cluster. The whole recognition process is deployed on a big video data processing platform to meet real‐time requirements. DRPRS is extensively evaluated in terms of accuracy, fault tolerance, and performance, which show that the proposed approach is efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Intelligent Transport SystemsSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207