MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789904340 · doi:10.22148/16.018

Linked Reading: Digital Historicism and Early Modern Discourses of Race around Shakespeare’s Othello

2018· article· en· W2789904340 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James Lee, Blaine Greteman, Jason Lee, David Eichmann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cultural Analytics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Crisis of the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoricismIdeologyRace (biology)New HistoricismThe RenaissanceLiteratureReading (process)ArtSexual differenceAestheticsGender studiesPhilosophySociologyPsychologyPsychoanalysisArt historyLinguisticsPoliticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As Renaissance conceptions of otherness have become a locus of critical study,no work has been more central for making the case about dominant ideologiesof race than Shakespeare’s Othello. Ania Loomba has suggested that ”more than any other play of the time, Othello allows us to see that skin colour, religion,and location were often contradictorily yoked together within ideologies of ‘race,’and that all these attributes were animated by notions of sexual and gender difference.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cultural AnalyticsSame topicFinancial Crisis of the 21st CenturyFrench-language works237,207