MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789912341 · doi:10.1190/geo2016-0668.1

Removal of galvanic distortion effects in 3D magnetotelluric data by an equivalent source technique

2017· article· en· W2789912341 on OpenAlexaff
Wenwu Tang, Yaoguo Li, Douglas W. Oldenburg, Jianxin Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsDistortion (music)Electrical impedanceElectric fieldPolarization (electrochemistry)Inversion (geology)AcousticsGeologyAlgorithmElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical resistivity and conductivityPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringChemistrySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The galvanic distortion induced by the electric charge buildup across near-surface inhomogeneities can severely affect the interpretation of magnetotelluric (MT) data for deeper structures. In addition to the methods already available, we have developed an alternative approach for processing MT impedance data with such distortions using an equivalent source technique. One prerequisite for the method is that all data are acquired on the surface, which is nearly always the case in land-based MT surveys. The method works with the electric field scaled from the impedance data and constructs an equivalent electrical polarization layer that attempts to reproduce the signal in the data while misfitting the galvanic distortion. Because of the uncorrelated characteristics of galvanic distortions across multiple stations at the same frequency, they can be distinguished and removed by constructing an equivalent source layer of electrical polarization using a regularized inverse formulation. The tradeoff between the signal and distortion is achieved through the use of generalized cross-validation method during the equivalent source construction, whereas the choice of equivalent source parameters also affects the separation. Numerical tests indicate that good results are obtained when the depth of the equivalent source layer is slightly greater than 10 times the nominal data spacing, and the lateral extent is twice that of the data area. The simultaneous processing with multiple frequencies yields more stable apparent resistivity curves than the separate single-frequency processing. The method has performed well in removing the galvanic distortions in the synthetic- and field-data examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207