Nontraumatic Fracture of a Custom-Made Wagner Cone Prosthesis Hip Stem: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fractures of modern cementless stems are almost extinct. However, extra small stems used for cases of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are still at risk for this complication. We review the fracture of a small size 11, custom-made Wagner cone prosthesis in a 70 year old female patient. The patient had a body-mass index (BMI) of 22.2, 7 yrs after undergoing a total hip arthroplasty. The procedure was undertaken to correct extreme high-riding congenital hip dysplasia. She presented with sudden pain due to a non-traumatic fracture of the stem, just below the proximal third region. At revision, it was apparent that the stem had a concrete distal fixation, whereas the proximal part was loose and probably failed due to cantilever bending fatigue, although the patient had small stature and a low BMI. We trephined out the distal portion, and the patient was successfully revised with a cemented DDH Co-Cr stem. It is our belief that care should be taken when choosing extra small, cementless implants with distal fixation. Cemented prostheses may offer a safe alternative in such cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".