MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2789943313 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.319

A319 THE MURINE CECAL DEVELOPMENTAL MICRORNA SIGNATURE

2018· article· en· W2789943313 on OpenAlexafffundabout
A Alraefaei, Amel Taïbi, Elena M. Comelli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKuwait UniversityUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsmicroRNABiologyContext (archaeology)AndrologyOffspringCecumFold changeLitterTranscriptomeImmunologyGene expressionBioinformaticsGeneticsGeneMedicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a key role in intestinal gene expression regulation and their dysregulation has been observed in paediatric intestinal pathologies such as necrotizing enterocolitis and inflammatory bowel disease. In this context, miRNAs are being considered as diagnostic and prognostic markers. Though, little is known about the intestinal miRNA signature during postnatal maturation. To investigate the murine cecal miRNA signature during postnatal maturation Specific-pathogen-free C57BL/6-Elite male and female mice 6–8 weeks old were housed in sterile conditions. Mice were bred harem-style; at weaning (postnatal day (PND) 21), offspring were caged based on sex and dam. Each litter (n=7) was followed longitudinally and offspring were sacrificed at PND 14, 21 and 36 (n=1 male per litter and time point). Total RNA was extracted from cecal tissue and used to profile the expression of 578 miRNAs with the nCounter® Mouse V1.5 miRNA Expression Assay (NanoString Technologies, Inc.). Data was analyzed with nSolver™ Analysis Software 3.0 and statistical analysis and hierarchal clustering were completed in R. Target prediction was completed in TargetScan Release 7.1 and miRDB databases. 207 miRNAs were detected in cecal tissue. Of these, 10 miRNAs were significantly differentially expressed over time (p<0.05, FDR<0.05) in which 4 miRNAs were overexpressed at both PND 21 and 36 compared to PND 14 (2.0–7.7 fold change) and 6 miRNAs were underexpressed (0.2–0.6 fold change). When comparing PND 36 to PND 21, 2 miRNAs were overexpressed (1.9–16.7 fold change) and 5 miRNAs were underexpressed (0.3–0.6 fold change). Samples clustered according to postnatal age based on the expression profile of these 10 miRNAs. Prediction analysis identified 3,525 genes as potential targets of these miRNAs, including genes involved in the intestinal barrier function and immune system. This study shows that the cecal miRNA signature evolves during early postnatal life with potential implications for intestinal homeostasis. Selected miRNAs may serve as nutritional or pharmacological targets. NSERC Discovery grant to EMC. AA is the recipient of a full scholarship from Kuwait University, State of Kuwait. EMC holds the Lawson Family Chair in Microbiome Nutrition Research at the University of Toronto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→