MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789944399 · doi:10.1002/aic.16094

Highly efficient methane reforming over a low‐loading Ru/γ‐Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst in a Pd‐Ag membrane reactor

2018· article· en· W2789944399 on OpenAlexaff
David S. A. Simakov, Yuriy Román‐Leshkov

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsSyngasMethaneCatalysisSteam reformingMembrane reactorChemistryHydrogenBar (unit)Catalytic reformingMethane reformerCarbon fibersChemical engineeringNuclear chemistryHydrogen productionMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural gas can be reformed to syngas (CH4 + H2O = CO + 3H2), at temperatures above 850°C. Membrane catalytic reformers can provide high CH4 conversions at temperatures below 650°C, by separating H2 from the reactive mixture. Traditional Ni‐based catalysts suffer from low activity at low temperatures and deactivate rapidly by coking, particularly at low steam/carbon ratios. In this study, an ultralow loading (0.15 wt %) Ru/γ‐Al2O3 catalyst was implemented in a lab‐scale membrane reformer, using a supported 5μm Pd‐Ag film membrane. Methane conversions above 90% were achieved at 650°C, 8 bar, and H2O/CH4 = 2, 3 with contact times of ca. 10 s. The system generated up to 3.5 mol of ultrapure H2 per mol of CH4 fed, with a maximum power density of 0.9 kW/L. No significant deactivation was observed after 200 h time on stream, even when using low H2O:CH4 ratios. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 64: 3101–3108, 2018

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIChE JournalSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207