MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789956426 · doi:10.1109/tac.2018.2809594

On the Local Input–Output Stability of Event-Triggered Control Systems

2018· article· en· W2789956426 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Ghodrat, Horacio J. Marquez

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBounded functionLipschitz continuityNonlinear systemFunction (biology)Stability (learning theory)Event (particle physics)Control theory (sociology)Property (philosophy)Applied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsControl (management)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies performance preserving event design in nonlinear event-based control systems based on a local L2-type performance criterion. Considering a finite gain local L2-stable disturbance driven continuous-time system, we propose a triggering mechanism so that the resulting sampled-data system preserves similar disturbance attenuation local L2-gain property. The results are applicable to nonlinear systems with exogenous disturbances bounded by some Lipschitz-continuous function of state. It is shown that an exponentially decaying function of time, combined with the proposed triggering condition, extends the interevent periods. Compared to the existing works, this paper analytically estimates the increase in intersampling periods at least for an arbitrary period of time. We also propose a so-called discrete triggering condition to quantitatively find the improvement in interevent times at least for an arbitrary number of triggering iterations. Illustrative examples support the analytically derived results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207