MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789964755 · doi:10.15642/ad.2017.7.2.342-365

Penerapan Asas Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama

2018· article· en· W2789964755 on OpenAlexaff
Rosdalina Rosdalina, Edi Gunawan

Bibliographic record

Venueal-Daulah Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawPolitical scienceSettlement (finance)BusinessFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Court is a judicial institution, which has the authority to settle cases between the parties. In carrying out these duties and authorities, this institution adheres to the simple, quick, and low cost principles as mandated in the judicial power law. The application of simple and quick principles in terms of making lawsuits or petitions is as practiced in a Religious Court of Manado. One of the elements that helps is the existence of Legal Aid Post (POSBAKUM) based in the Religious Court of Manado. As for the settlement of cases, the application of the principle has not been implemented properly. This is because the parties are less seriously coming at the trial that has been determined and the judges often postpone the hearing by several argumentations. The cost of litigation in a Religious Court of Manado is determined based on the radius or distance of the domiciled party territory. If the Plaintiff is incompetent and has a poor card, it may incur a court fee waiver. Abstrak: Pengadilan merupakan lembaga yudikatif yang memiliki kewenangan menyelesaikan perkara antar para pihak. Dalam menjalankan tugas dan kewenangan tersebut, lembaga ini menganut asas sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam undang-undang kekuasaan kehakiman. Penerapan asas sederhana dan cepat dalam hal pembuatan gugatan ataupun permohonan di Pengadilan Agama yang diteliti yaitu Pengadilan Agama Manado dapat dilaksanakan dengan baik. Salah satu unsur yang membantu adalah adanya Pos Bantuan Hukum (POSBAKUM) yang berkantor di Pengadilan Agama Manado. Adapun dalam hal penyelesaian perkara, penerapan asas tersebut belum dilaksanakan dengan baik. Hal ini disebabkan karena para pihak kurang bersungguh-sungguh hadir pada persidangan yang telah ditentukan dan majelis hakim sering menunda sidang dengan alasan dinas luar atau cuti. Adapun biaya berperkara di Pengadilan Agama Manado ditentukan berdasarkan radius atau jarak wilayah pihak berdomisili. Jika Penggugat termasuk masyarakat tidak mampu dan memiliki kartu miskin, maka dapat dikenakan pembebasan biaya perkara.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueal-Daulah Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan IslamSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207