MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790012731 · doi:10.1111/joms.12337

Poles Apart: The Arctic & Management Studies

2018· article· en· W2790012731 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gail Whiteman, Dmitry Yumashev

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Management Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSeventh Framework Programme
KeywordsArcticFrontierWhite (mutation)Climate changeHistoryOceanographyGeographyPhysical geographyArchaeologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If the Arctic is screaming, it's hard for management studies to hear.A search using the word 'Arctic' in the archives of the Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Organization Studies, Organization Science, Administrative Science Quarterly reveals a blank space.Maybe you haven't noticed -this isn't a premiere destination for management school faculty.But its absence keeps us -a Canadian and Russian transdisciplinary team -awake at night.Russians refer to the Arctic (ffhrnbra) as 'RhaØybØ edeh' (Far North) and 'þagjkzhüe' (Beyond the Pole).Canadians call it the 'Great White North'.The Saami, Nenets, Khanty, Evenk, Chukchi, Aleut, Yupik and Inuit call the Arctic 'home'.The oil and gas industry call it the 'Last Frontier'.But management scholars don't tend to call it anything.We seek to change that.This may not be easy.Like any discipline, management scholars have well-trodden paths, and ours rarely goes north of 608.Yet scientists from other disciplines (oceanography, biology, ecology, climate, anthropology, glaciology) love the thrill of the remote.From our own experiences and through shared storytelling, we recognize that research in the Arctic is not for the fainthearted.We know numerous scientists who got stranded, faced polar bears, survived submarine fires under the ice and helicopter crashes on land.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Management StudiesSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207