MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790017442 · doi:10.1080/20450249.2018.1447955

Rip up roads at the right time only: Your research round-up for Q1 2018

2018· article· en· W2790017442 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CRI writers

Bibliographic record

VenueConstruction Research and Innovation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Bridge (graph theory)EngineeringCivil engineeringForensic engineeringOperations researchTransport engineeringHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Why resurface a road in May when the pipes underneath are due for repairs in August? That question, and others like it, prompted civil engineering researchers in Montreal to devise a computational model for planning joined-up infrastructure maintenance, which they say would deliver big savings to cities. Also in this research round-up for the first quarter of 2018: a stretchy bridge in Austria, why orderly cities get hotter, and new intelligence in the war against concrete corrosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.129
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.777

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.129
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.014
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0140.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4550.289

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConstruction Research and InnovationSame topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207