Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstrakPencak silat merupakan seni bela diri yang berakar dari budaya asli bangsa Indonesia. Perkembangan dan penyebaran silat secara historis mulai tercatat ketika penyebarannya banyak dipengaruhi oleh kaum ulama, seiring dengan penyebaran agama Islam pada abad ke-15 di Nusantara. Demikian pula halnya pencak silat Banten Bandrong, mulai dikenal seiring dengan berdirinya kerajaan Islam Banten. Saat ini silat asli Banten mulai kurang diperhatikan keberadaannya. Salah satu sebab ditinggalkannya seni dan budaya pencak silat asli Banten ini karena manajemen perguruan silat yang masih bersifat seadanya, padahal transformasi pengelolaan dari metode tradisional ke arah yang lebih modern mutlak diperlukan seiring dengan perkembangan zaman. Atas dasar itu, maka dilakukan penelitian mengenai Perguruan Silat Bandrong Renggong Ampel di Kabupaten Serang dengan tujuan mengungkapkan latar belakang perjalanan sejarah serta dinamika perkembangannya. Adapun metode yang digunakan adalah metode sejarah dengan melakukan wawancara. Pada kenyataannya dengan pengelolaan yang terorganisasi silat bandrong yang merupakan seni asli Banten ini dapat lebih dikenal oleh masyarakat luasAbstractPencak silat is a kind of martial art that has root in original culture of Indonesia. Its development and spreading were historically recorded when the ulamas (Islamic scholars) influence it along with the spreading of Islam in the Archipelago during 15th century. Pencak silat Bandrong became familiar along with the establishment of the Islamic Kingdom of Banten. Today it is gradually abandoned due to mismanagement in the organization, whereas it is necessary to transform traditional management into modern one. Based on this fact the author conducted this research in order to reveal the background of its historical course and dynamics of its development. History method andinterview were used in the research. In fact, good management could make Bandrong martial art more familiar to society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.051 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".