A Generalized Lidar-Based Model for Predicting the Merchantable Volume of Balsam Fir of Sites Located along a Bioclimatic Gradient in Quebec, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lidar-based models rely on an optimal relationship between the field and the lidar data for accurate predictions of forest attributes. This relationship may be altered by the variability in the stand growth conditions or by the temporal discrepancy between the field inventory and the lidar survey. In this study, we used lidar data to predict the timber merchantable volume (MV) of five sites located along a bioclimatic gradient of temperature and elevation. The temporal discrepancies were up to three years. We adjusted a random canopy height coefficient (accounting for the variability amongst sites), and a growth function (accounting for the growth during the temporal discrepancy), to the predictive model. The MV could be predicted with a pseudo-R2 of 0.86 and a residual standard deviation of 24.3 m3 ha−1. The average biases between the field-measured and the predicted MVs were small. The variability of MV predictions was related to the bioclimatic gradient. Fixed-effect models that included a bioclimatic variable provided similar prediction accuracies. This study suggests that the variability amongst sites, the occurrence of a bioclimatic gradient and temporal discrepancies are essential in building a generalized lidar-based model for timber volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".