Bibliographic record
Abstract
Du 20 fevrier au 22 septembre 2012, au cours de la revolte etudiante et du mouvement social du « printemps erable » quebecois, le groupe Fermaille a recueilli et mis en circulation des textes poetiques, ecrits a chaud, qui temoignent de l’intensite de l’evenement. Le « printemps erable » vient se manifester de facon transversale au sein de ce que je propose de lire comme un recueil lyrique qui ne se limiterait pas a l’expression du debordement emotionnel associe a un moment de crise. Les conditions d’emergence de toute parole lyrique, que sont l’invention d’un espace, la conscience collective et la poussee subjective, sont accentuees par la facon dont ces poemes « realisent » l’evenement au fur et a mesure de leur mise en circulation. Mon hypothese est que l’elan lyrique, en tant qu’il deborde les habitudes expressives du moi, est implique dans les devenirs revolutionnaires et permet de rendre compte de la facon dont la parole en mouvement cree a la fois un espace d’expression et une collectivite exprimee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".