MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790125249 · doi:10.1039/c8dt00324f

Impact of nuclearity and topology on the single molecule magnet behaviour of hexaazatrinaphtylene-based cobalt complexes

2018· article· en· W2790125249 on OpenAlexafffund
Maykon A. Lemes, François Magnan, Bulat Gabidullin, Jaclyn L. Brusso

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch and Innovation FoundationCanada Foundation for InnovationConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Science CouncilUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMagnetCobaltSingle-molecule magnetTopology (electrical circuits)MoleculeCrystallographyChemistryMaterials scienceComputational chemistryInorganic chemistryPhysicsOrganic chemistryMathematicsMagnetizationQuantum mechanicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hexaazatrinaphtylene-based transition metal complex that exhibits single molecule magnet (SMM) behaviour is reported herein. Both monometallic (1) and bimetallic (2) CoII complexes with distorted octahedral geometries could be obtained through a straightforward change in synthetic conditions. Field induced SMM behaviour was exhibited by 1, with a D value of -60 cm-1 and Ueff = 17 K originating from the unquenched orbital angular momentum of the octahedral CoII (d7) centre. On the other hand, 2 exhibits weak antiferromagnetic interactions with a positive D value, thus preventing the observation of SMM behaviour. This investigation reveals the influence of both nuclearity and topology on the magnetic properties of HATN based complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207