PROPOSED OVAL ST. JUDE MEDICAL VALVE: EFFECT OF HEART RATE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the hemodynamic performance of the conventional St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve and our proposed design known as the oval SJM valve are studied and compared. These studies are based on a wide range of physiological heart rates, i.e., 70–130[Formula: see text]bpm, in the opening phase. We designed and developed a precise computational platform to assess the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves for laminar and turbulent regimes. Also, as one of the fundamental changes applied to the conventional SJM vales, the housing is considered oval similar to oval shape of annulus. Results clearly indicate hemodynamic improvements in the proposed design over the SJM valve. The improvements are characterized by lower shear stress and wall shear stress distributions around the valve and leaflets, and lower valve pressure drop compared to that of the conventional SJM model. The proposed design shows potential and merits additional development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".