MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790149681 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.134

A133 EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF VEDOLIZUMAB INDUCTION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS: REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE IN A TERTIARY IBD CENTRE

2018· article· en· W2790149681 on OpenAlexaffabout
Petros Zezos, Boyko Kabakchiev, Adam V. Weizman, Geoffrey C. Nguyen, Neeraj Narula, Ken Croitoru, Hillary Steinhart, Mark S. Silverberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineUlcerative colitisInternal medicineGastroenterologyPancolitisAdverse effectInflammatory bowel diseaseClinical endpointSurgeryClinical trialDiseaseColonoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody which inhibits leukocyte vascular adhesion and migration into the gastrointestinal tract through α4β7 integrin blockade. This agent became available in Canada in mid-2015 for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). To investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) as induction therapy in UC patients at a tertiary IBD centre and to examine predictors of remission. Demographic and clinical data for UC patients treated with 300mg VDZ infusions at weeks 0, 2, 6 and 14 was gathered retrospectively. Clinical remission (CR, partial Mayo score≤2) and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) after the first 3 infusions (induction phase) between weeks 8–12 were the primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were CR and SFCR after 4 infusions (1st maintenance infusion) between weeks 16–20. Adverse events were also recorded. Data from 68 UC patients (63% male, median age 33 years, median disease duration 6 years, median pMayo 7) were analyzed. Anti-TNF naive were 31% and 69% had pancolitis. At the time of first infusion, 49% were on systemic steroids and 20% on an immunomodulator, while 44% patients were started on VDZ monotherapy. Median partial Mayo scores and median CRP levels improved significantly after 3 and 4 VDZ infusions compared to baseline (p<0.05). After 3 infusions (n=68), 37% and 31% of the patients achieved CR and SFCR respectively. After 4 infusions (n=53), 36% and 32% of the patients were in CR and SFCR respectively. Seventy percent of the non-responders after the 3rd infusion remained non-responders after the 4th infusion. Baseline characteristics including disease duration less than 5 years, no prior anti-TNF exposure, immunomodulator concurrent treatment, mild disease (p=0.025) and CRP less than 5mg/L (p=0.004) were associated with clinical remission after the first 3 infusions. Clinical remission after 3 VDZ infusions was significantly associated with sustained clinical remission after 4 infusions (p<0.001). Overall, 12% discontinued VDZ due to no response and 7% underwent elective proctocolectomy. There were no infusion reactions or serious side effects. The most common side effect was headache (7%). VDZ is an effective, safe and well tolerated treatment option in refractory UC patients. Clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission can be achieved in 1/3 of the patients after the induction phase. This real life series in a tertiary care centre demonstrates similar efficacy results as the other real-world clinical studies. Assessment of VDZ response after the 3rd infusion could be critical to determine treatment benefits and decide further management. Baseline characteristics and vedolizumab treatment outcomes in UC patients None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→